|
|
Post by victorvondoom on Jan 9, 2007 6:37:22 GMT 1
 Might be PP or secretarial. Any guesses? |
|
|
|
Post by Bill on Jan 9, 2007 8:15:50 GMT 1
PrePrint...
|
|
|
|
Post by victorvondoom on Jan 9, 2007 16:23:32 GMT 1
That's what I figured. I only sent an email so it's not that bad. Oh well. |
|
|
|
Post by robertderidder on Jan 12, 2007 18:38:07 GMT 1
I have a hand signed version of that picture, but it wasn't thru email.  |
|
|
|
Post by Bill on Jan 12, 2007 18:39:22 GMT 1
Wow! Did you send it to the usual adress then??
|
|
|
|
Post by robertderidder on Jan 12, 2007 19:07:55 GMT 1
movieset actually, but it was a while ago
|
|
|
|
Post by victorvondoom on Jan 12, 2007 19:22:51 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Bill on Jan 13, 2007 10:42:17 GMT 1
On your photo you can't see if it's marker that she signed the photo with. At Robert's photo it is clearly visible that it's a marker.
|
|
|
|
Post by robertderidder on Jan 13, 2007 12:39:12 GMT 1
Preprints are actually quite easy to spot. Just hold the picture under a light and check if the ink is solid black or has purplish glow over it. Markers have a purple shine.
Now if it's not a PP it could be an autopen as they usually use markers for those too, so then you'd have to check it against other examples.
|
|
|
|
Post by victorvondoom on Jan 14, 2007 2:27:56 GMT 1
Preprints are actually quite easy to spot. Just hold the picture under a light and check if the ink is solid black or has purplish glow over it. Markers have a purple shine. Now if it's not a PP it could be an autopen as they usually use markers for those too, so then you'd have to check it against other examples. I'm thinking it might be an autopen. If it was a PP, I don't think they'd take the time to print up that many different photos. |
|
|
|
Post by Indiana Dirk on Jan 14, 2007 20:25:21 GMT 1
Katey Sagal is known for poolboys,
|
|
|
|
Post by robertderidder on Jan 15, 2007 11:50:27 GMT 1
So how do you know?
|
|
|
|
Post by Indiana Dirk on Jan 15, 2007 14:19:51 GMT 1
Because you can read it at most sites with adresses.
|
|
|
|
Post by robertderidder on Jan 16, 2007 12:19:23 GMT 1
And now here, which really doesn't mean anything. So until proven fake... ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by robertderidder on Mar 1, 2007 22:43:08 GMT 1
Well at least these are 100% authentic:   |
|
